A polyphyletic group is a set of organisms, or other evolving elements, that have been grouped but do not share an immediate common ancestor.
The term is also applied to those groups that share characteristics that appear to be similar but have not been inherited from common ancestors these characteristics are known as homoplasies.
And the development and phenomenon of homoplasies are known as convergent evolution.
The arrangement of the members of a polyphyletic group is called a polyphyly.
Alternatively, polyphyletic is simply used to describe a group whose members come from multiple ancestral sources, regardless of the similarity of characteristics.
For example, the biological characteristic of warm-bloodedness evolved separately in the ancestors of mammals and the ancestors of birds.
Many biologists aim to avoid homoplasies in grouping taxa together and therefore it is frequently a goal to eliminate groups that are found to be polyphyletic.
This is often the stimulus for major revisions of the classification schemes.
Researchers concerned more with ecology than with systematics may take polyphyletic groups as legitimate subject matter; the similarities in activity within the fungus group Alternaria.
For example, can lead researchers to regard the group as a valid genus while recognizing its polyphyly.
The term polyphyly, or polyphyletic, derives from the two ancient Greek words polús, meaning “many, a lot of”, and phûlon, meaning “genus, species”, and refers to the fact that a polyphyletic group includes organisms (e.g., genera, species) arising from multiple ancestral sources.
Conversely, the term monophyly, or monophyletic, builds on the ancient Greek prefix mónos, meaning “alone, only, unique”, and refers to the fact that a monophyletic group includes organisms consisting of all the descendants of a unique common ancestor.
By comparison, the term paraphyly, or paraphyletic, uses the ancient Greek prefix pará, meaning “beside, near”, and refers to the situation in which one or several monophyletic subgroups are left apart from all other descendants of a unique common ancestor.
See also: Phylogenetic nomenclature § Philosophy
In many schools of taxonomy, the existence of polyphyletic groups in classification is discouraged.
For example, could be “All descendants of the last common ancestor of species X and Y”.
On the other hand, polyphyletic groups can often be delimited in terms of clades, for example, “the flying vertebrates consist of the bat, bird, and pterosaur clades”.
Because polyphyletic groups can frequently be defined as a sum of clades, they are usually considered less fundamental than monophyletic (single, whole) clades.
A stronger reason is that grouping species monophyletically facilitates prediction far more than does polyphyletic grouping.
For example, classifying a newly discovered grass in the monophyletic family Poaceae, the true grasses immediately results in numerous predictions about its structure and its developmental and reproductive characteristics, inherited from the common ancestor of this family.
In contrast, Linnaeus’ assignment of plants with two stamens to the polyphyletic class Diandria, while practical for identification, turns out to be useless for prediction, since the presence of exactly two stamens has developed convergently in many groups.
Predictive success is the touchstone by which theories are evaluated in all experimental sciences.
Species have a special status in systematics as being an observable feature of nature itself and as the basic unit of classification.
Hybrid species are a common phenomenon in nature, particularly in plants where polyploidy allows for rapid speciation